Hah, Mammogram, scientifically prove to me that George Washington was the first American president. Scientifically prove to me that anyone of your dead relatives loved you. Scientifically prove to me that Bach symphony's are superior to Mozart's. Etc.... or you can admit that science isn't the only way to show evidence for something to be true. There is historical proof as in Washington's case, testimony for your relatives love of you, etc.

PS Demon, he has many times before, but Mammogram doesn't like science that points to evidence of a creator. The creation of the universe itself from nothing, the universal constants of the universe that make the universe even possible, the language of DNA, the apparent design of the world, etc, etc.

I can see how you may construed that I had lost this thread since you know neither of us and are a relative noOb to this board. but may I submit to you that I have gave my "proof" in several other threads of this nature. In each case he had completely ignored my answer and attacked my grammar or veered the thread in a completely different direction. He never even acknowledged my proof.

My tact in this thread was to let him know that I know that he is closed minded, it wouldn't have mattered if I laid my cards (proof) on the table he would have shifted tables.

 

-----signature-----

I don't think he ever claimed any of that so it's not his job to provide evidence. Btw science doesn't "prove" anything.

And if you guys claim George Washington was your first president then I'll gladly take your word for it.

 

-----signature-----

Yes, "proof" -good one.

Still a sore looser I see, and no you haven't.. You said scientific proof, the most you've done in other threads is regurgitated "herp depr, close minded.. derp"

Same shtick as in this thread..

 

-----signature-----

Keep the stupid flowing Snarf, it's impressive.

 

-----signature-----

See? How am I suppose to argue against that? He can't even give references to what I had said. He is so closed minded that his brain translates anything I say in to, "herp depr, ...derp". They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result. For me to give him anymore proof, again and again and again so he could cogitate on it, would be insanity on my part.

 

-----signature-----

Late to the thread, but...great skit!

 

-----signature-----

I don't need to give a reference.. It's like the third thread you play this shtick in a thread and then you just keep on regurgitating it.

I know NuEM remembers your Evolution thread where you basically repeated it for 3 pages.





Well herp derp is actually a abbreviation for Fred Phelps of Phelps, which you basically always bring up when you're stranded by your own incompetence on a island of stupidity.

You've even got it in your sig, so you're not even original since you stole it from Bubble.

Well then you must be insane because you keep on repeating the same "close minded, phelps" bit, I've met you with the same thing over and over.. "I'm ready to see your scientific proof hand it to me" which you never do because you're to occupied repeating the same tired diatribe about how close minded I am.

So yes you're probably insane.

 

-----signature-----

Now now mammo, just because you have no answer doesn't mean you have to insult. You lose.