VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: Sad to see what has become of Warder Zerg [Locked]
King-of-the-Monkeys  1 star
Posts: 64
Registered:
"Hi i'm in Deleted. I really like cheesecake"


Wow, you too?!
Cerwyn_
Posts: 28
Registered: 2002-8-5 22:51:38
I am the only Fotm, noob bangwagoner, savage in the guild.


Personaly i wanted to be a RM, but i was asked to play a tank. Since i played my armsman for almost 1.5 years the idea of a heavy tank was enough for me not to play the game.


If there was a class like the Merc Or Bladesmaster i would have played, zerker is like neither of these, and quite boring.

Thanes do not fit into the gank group idea, ghal was already a skald, so only savage was left.


The idea of being mid on this server did not appeal to be, i would have liked hib, but we have the people willing to help on mid, that hib never had.


I enjoyed my BM > my savage anyday. The class is just more enjoyable for me.


bleh why all this anyway, we have run maby for 4 days, and have hardly won a fight.


and all this about runing 3-4 savage groups is just crazy. Why would be exclude people in our guild for just LFG savages in emain or SF?

 

-----signature-----
fotm
Mistwraith_KoT
Posts: 34
Registered:
A duel without dirty tricks and without buffs in no way indicates which class is more effective in rvr. Since dirty tricks is a 7 minute timer, it is up almost every battle that a merc fights in. I can't remember a single fight I have had a with a merc on my ranger where I didn't have dirty tricks on me.


Dirty tricks in not a realm ability, but rather a class ability. It's like telling a druid he can't use insta heal in a duel.
Haroof_II
Posts: 36
Registered: 2002-8-2 11:10:01
Mist, I keep telling all these other Mercs that but they don't listen.
NSMachin  2 stars
Title: Mighty Fruit Husk
Posts: 324
Registered: 2002-8-29 17:48:31
Heh... DAMN DIRTY TRICKS
offlchamp
Title: War Damn Eagle
Posts: 13
Registered: 2002-1-11 17:07:29
Here is the million dollar question is DT effective vs everyone? No it does very little good vs targets that mercs should be killing Healers/Casters since these classes will very rarely swing at a merc. It does however help a merc protect his casters and healers.


TW is more effective than DT at doing what a BM should be doing and that is killing casters and healers. BMs have access to a rear positional snare that mercs do not have access to. Does TW help protect healers/casters like DT no it does not at all. But BMs have a snare built in.


All this being said a duel between a merc and a BM reveals nothing at all about their effectiveness in RvR. Because if they are engaged with one another before the outcome of the battle is truly decided then both are friggin morons that do not know how to play their classes. So the outcome of a duel buffed or not buffed means nothing about RvR effectiveness.
NSMachin  2 stars
Title: Mighty Fruit Husk
Posts: 324
Registered: 2002-8-29 17:48:31
Who cares it'd be a good duel...


/slap
Gannd1
Posts: 12
Registered:
This post is getting big so I'd thought I'll pop my head in here and say


Fidelyid
Posts: 43
Registered:
wow gannd..


i never thought i'd see that pic again, i actually made that pic about a year and a half ago when i posted on genmay in the hardocp forums.


where did you find it?
Zweihainder
Posts: 5
Registered:
Well, since you all seem so concerned about what happened to us, here goes.


Around the start of summer, my grandmother was diagonosed with breast cancer, and shortly after my mother had a large tumor in her ovaries that was thought to be cancerous.


I won't bore you with details, but basically, there was a month - month and a half stretch where I didn't play at all.


While I was gone, Ghale had to sell his account, Tareh was barely playing, and Frungya wasn't playing that much. So WZ went without clerics and a GM, which basically ruined it.


When the /level command came out, they all decided to roll on Hib / Palo for whatever reason. I started playing again about a week after they started there. That pretty much fell apart because our chanters weren't playing much, and good luck on leveling in Hib without chanters.


I played a regrowth/nuture druid, and I couldn't even find groups. I had the LFG tag on all the time, and I frequently asked people for groups. It was basically, do you have a chanter or eld to bring with you ? No, well, gtfo out then. This as the primary healing class.


So we decided Palo sucked, and we wanted to come back to Lance. It was either Hib or Mid . . . and if you don't believe that, you can ask some of the hibs Ghale asked for access to their accounts for PLing purposes.


We ended up rolling Mids because three of the people that we played with on Hib/Palo had level 50 mids already. We also had access to a couple of SMs, a pac healer, a LGM SCer, and a couple of salavagers. Which meant easy leveling, cheap SCing, and getting all the money from the /salvage crap as we leveled.


We rolled Mids instead of Hibs because we had a better set-up in Mid /shrug.


As far a savages, please, when we start running real groups we'll have 1 savage. 1 savage is hardly a FoTM savage group.


And seriously, big, hearty RoFL for anyone who condemns us for leaving Alb. WZ was a blast and all, but when there's 3-4 Hib and Mid groups combined in Emain, and 8 Alb groups every nite, it gets rather boring. We spent more time trying to avoid the 3749273 albs than we did looking for fights. It was just flat out boring. There was no one to fight.


Overpowered warriors and aug healers inc.

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.