notmforce2k posted:

---

Aer,

HOW DO YOU CONSTANTLY IGNOTE THE FACTS THAT REFUTE YOUR CLAIM?? Your claims have been scientifically debunked time and time again. Stop blaming the state for creating some kind of dogma or illusion here. You want to know why no one is wasting time talking about it? Because they know what really happened. They have seen the events and seen the data that supports it. They sleep well at night.

---

notmforce2k posted:

---

Aer,

HOW DO YOU CONSTANTLY IGNOTE THE FACTS THAT REFUTE YOUR CLAIM?? Your claims have been scientifically debunked time and time again. Stop blaming the state for creating some kind of dogma or illusion here. You want to know why no one is wasting time talking about it? Because they know what really happened. They have seen the events and seen the data that supports it. They sleep well at night.

---

Aerlinthian posted:

---

??

I don't make a claim on who it was done by as that deviates from the primary thrust that people must first accept, the science facts. The science facts that the buildings were brought down by chemical application is my only claim, and is supported by architect & engineering professionals and the scientists who have done the exhaustive physics work to demonstrate that it was a chemical applied event contrary to the NIST report that ultimately brought the buildings down.

You also have:
Fire Fighters for 9/11 truth.
Pilots for 9/11 truth.

It takes courageous professionals to put their names and careers on the line against popular dogma promulgated by the establishment/state.

---