VaultNetwork.netVault Network Boards
Author Topic: should someone with brain dysfunction be held accountable for their actions? [Locked]
Anebriated  3 stars
Title: I should be reading a book
Posts: 650
Registered: 2003-1-27 21:26:11
Webscar posted:

If you know he'll likely kill someone and by a court of law it can be proven that the warning signs are there; then yes you have some liability.



Jezza_Belle posted:

If you know you're a danger because you can't stop stabbing things, and it will escalate to people, the responsible thing to do is tell a mental health professional that you may be a danger to others.



do you guys have experience with very mentally ill people? you guys blab on and on about how self-evident it is if a person is dangerous or not. it really makes me doubt if you have ever talked to such a person. many serious illnesses fluctuate wildly. one day they can't get out of bed they're so depressed and the next they are tying a noose. you think it's obvious or something?
Webscar  3 stars
Title: /Yiffs in Hell [face_furry]
Posts: 946
Registered: 2002-11-30 00:27:37
Anebriated posted:

do you guys have experience with very mentally ill people? you guys blab on and on about how self-evident it is if a person is dangerous or not. it really makes me doubt if you have ever talked to such a person. many serious illnesses fluctuate wildly. one day they can't get out of bed they're so depressed and the next they are tying a noose. you think it's obvious or something?

While I agree with you fundamentally I must disagree with your use of the letter Waffle within this statement.

By a large I believe that things are set in stone. In fact, I would go so far to say that I'd bet my solid gold chizel that can cut through diamond that you'd have a varying degree of difficulty in persuading the jelly to date the jam.

 

-----signature-----
Vagina Purse: 'A daily blog about what I find inside me' ~Ticky
.-Vega-.  2 stars
Posts: 420
Registered: 2005-6-20 13:31:05
silvadel posted:

If you are not able to be held accountable for your actions then whoever in charge of you should be. In essence if you are so very messed up that you can hurt somebody because you do not think it is wrong -- well then your guardian should have been watching you. Nobody should just be released into the population without someone watching over you if you are not accountable.



This. Therefore, no, you can't hold every one accountable for their actions. /Thread

 

-----signature-----
Ron Paul 2012
jeune  1 star
Posts: 216
Registered: 2005-5-29 13:25:11
The only case I can think of our society not holding someone accountable for their actions is with very young children doing something they just did not know about... and in that case it is usually the parents fault.

Everyone is accountable for their actions in our society... we just punish them differently.

If you get off of death penalty/prison for being mentally incompetent you do not walk away free.

 

-----signature-----
"Whenever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other then we shall have no more wars. We shall be all alike — brothers of one father and mother, with one sky above us and one country around us and one government for all."
Webscar  3 stars
Title: /Yiffs in Hell [face_furry]
Posts: 946
Registered: 2002-11-30 00:27:37

 

-----signature-----
Vagina Purse: 'A daily blog about what I find inside me' ~Ticky
-Mithan-  4 stars
Title: VNBoard Admin
Posts: 1,287
Registered: 2000-3-1 11:53:15
.-Vega-. posted:

-Mithan- posted:

Steelwind_Oo posted:

The problem I have with all the cases of insanity pleas or whatever is it doesn't change the fact that someone died that wouldn't have died otherwise and that (assuming this is the case) wasn't doing anything that deserved death. So Billy Bonko throws a gasket and drives over a crowd I don't care if he was sane or not at the time he needs to be removed from society so that it doesn't happen again. Call it a punishment or call it common sense. And I don't mean removed from society to a padded cell for a couple months until he convinces everyone he is all better.



And it gets worse the more people realize there really is no God out there and afterlife and other BS and that we only get ONE SHOT at life.

When we realize this, life becomes even more dearer.



Like being an administrator for a 3rd rate obscure video game website



Oh is that supposed to bother me? I guess you took my comment as a sleight against mentally handicapped people and felt the need to respond to me.

Please don't worry, I had no intention on commenting about your mental handicap.


Ps: vnboards were the biggest game sites at one time. Shrug.

 

-----signature-----
I survived to the end and got nothing out of it, but hey.
TheNinthSeal  1 star
Posts: 195
Registered: 2012-2-21 07:57:37
-Mithan- posted:

I believe you are always responsible for your actions no matter what. To me the question has always been about whether the punishment should be the same and I don't believe it should be in certain situations.



I'm sorry that is so stupid. There are plenty of situations where someone is not responsible for their actions. If you are so jacked up in the brain you think you are having a tea party but really you are eating someones face, you are not responsible for your actions. Obviously they should be locked up, because it is dangerous, but not because they should be punished, at that point it is just about cutting losses. They are not a bad person, they are a very sick individual who really needs help. Maybe that help is beyond possible, who knows. But either way it's just sad.

People see this as an unacceptable answer because of the slippery slope argument. What's to stop someone who is fully aware of their actions who just happens to want to eat faces from using this excuse? I understand that argument, but its the baby with the bathwater type thing. Do we throw these sick people in the general population in a prison because some of them might not be sick?

Most people just want to judge someone else, and this reality is kind of a block for those types. People want someone to fry so they can feel like there world fits tidily in a small box. The truth is, some people are born tigers. We dont say tigers are evil, even if they were to kill a kid, they are just animals doing what they are programmed to do. This is different than forgiveness, because it isnt an issue of safety, judgement, OR forgiveness. It's a matter of safety. If I leave a tiger in a room with my kid, my kid WILL die. We dont let tigers wander the streets, we put them down if they are found. Not because we have judged them, just because we know what they do, and we simply cant have that done to people.

VaultNetwork.net is an independently operated community forum and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or technically based on IGN, GameSpy, FilePlanet, GameStats, or the former IGN/GameSpy Vault Network.
References to VaultNetwork.net mean this site/domain. VNBoards-style presentation is a visual homage only. By using this site, you agree to the forum rules.