AxeonLC posted:
I use the 24-70 f2.8 just slightly less than my most commonly used lens, my 70-200 f2.8 IS.
I find it ridiculously handy as a walk-around travel lens / newspaper photojournalism lens / backup body wedding lens for ambient shots.
It's an awesome lens, but so much of my photography tends to be travelling and free hand shooting in dim-light. With neither a full-frame camera or the intention to get one in the next few years, I think the Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS lens is a better fit since it has the IS and much lighter weight. In the future, if I make the jump to a full-frame camera, I'll be ready to invest in a full set of L series lenses and can use the EF-S and my current camera as a back-up or travel camera...
-----signature-----
'member dat?
True dat.