Ahh, I didn't realize we were speaking in general. This board was recreated recently for some unfathomable mod reason so the majority of the posts are gone, which is why you saw no mention of a lot of things.
Steven Erikson does some things really well and others not so well. I love his characters and their 'cool factor'. He can build up characters so much that a simple conversation between two of them is exciting, not to mention a sword fight. There are hundred page conversations on message boards over who the best swordsman in the Malazan universe is, that is how good he is at creating an aura of coolness around characters.
My least favorite aspect of his writing are the over-long self indulgent chapters or even entire storylines that he writes from random, uninteresting PoVs in order to show some small thing relevant to the story and a whole bunch of crap he feels like relating.
I think these chapters along with the 84,000 different storylines makes the entire thing disjointed and in many ways senseless. I think it is impossible for him to tie up every loose end in the final book, most likely the majority of it will be completely left untouched. It isn't like WoT where every storyline ends with the final battle- he has left so much stuff sitting I can't even remember it all to be bothered. I'm sure there are threads that are relevant to other threads in his mind but it is impossible for us to track them over 10,000 pages and put everything together.
Does anyone know what the story is about? I mean really understand? Can anyone actually tie the majority of events in to the crippled god who is supposedly, but damn if I understand why, the focus of all of this? It is almost like he is showing us a snapshot of this world, specific relevance be damned. Without reading it two or three times I think the complexity of the series is too much for a mere mortal to piece together, especially waiting a year between books.
I don't mean to be overly critical, it is possibly my favorite fantasy series ever written, but I do not think it is perfect. I don't think I would want it simpler or easier to follow because that would take something away from it, I just wish I had the key in my head.
My one genuine complaint is that he kills of characters he no longer has a use for is pointless ways. He uses them cheaply to make some philosophical point, not because it is worthwhile, but because he needs to dispose of them as they have already served their purpose. I can't mention the one that pisses me off irreparably because you are not there.
-----signature-----
If I have burnt my bridges I will walk on water.
If you're on the shore, then you're sure not me, oh
My seething wrath and urge for blood is fueled by searing hate.
I'm X X X bitch, triple X rated.