|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
BD Pets
|
|
Has Mythic ever given a reason why they think BD pets should be allowed to go through closed doors? Just curious. Was defending a keep recently and there were 2 or 3 BDs in the Mid attackers. They sent their pets in and they killed everyone in the keep without any Mid being touched,so I was just wondering why Mythic think this is fine.
I am not long playing this so if this has been answered and if there are solutions to counteract BD pets please accept my apologies.
|
Phortune
Posts: 12
Registered: 2004-7-12 12:52:10
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
BD Pets
|
|
The same reason chanter pets and cabby pets do.
|
|
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
BD Pets
|
|
Ah so, did not realise this though I think the damage BD pets can do byfar outweighs the damage chanter and cabby pets can do or am I wrong in this also?
|
nezitx
Posts: 6
Registered: 2008-8-25 17:28:13
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
BD Pets
|
I'm guessing this was in a battleground? Yeah its a bit hard to deal with, but it isn't an issue @ 50.
And the reason the BD pets are much more of a pain then Cabby or Enchanter pets is because the BD has a lot more of their character invested in their pets. If a BD loses their pets, not only do they have to resummon up to 4 (instead of 1) but they have very limited things to do I would argue, compared to a cabby or enchanter that lost their pet.
-----signature-----
Sprenja <| Paradox |>
Nez(...) all retired.
|
Jim_Digriz
Posts: 119
Registered: 2001-11-10 07:09:49
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
BD Pets
|
I think it's more about mythic giving up trying to fix it, rather than believing that it should happen.
-----signature-----
A paradox arises when premature insight
clashes with prevailing nonsense
- Karl Kraus
|
