| Author |
Topic:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
[Locked] |
Gloriena
Posts: 48
Registered: 2004-2-13 06:26:27
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
Just checked the other realms selfdebuffing classes, and compared which
baseline spells they get to use in Cathal Valley (Those they can self-debuff that is)
Spiritmaster:
lvl 48 - 179 dmg baseline spirit
Cabalist:
lvl 45 - 164 dmg baseline body
Runemaster:
lvl 43 - 155.7 dmg baseline cold
Enchanter:
lvl 41 - 143 dmg baseline heat (Bleh!!)
As you can see, the enchanters baseline heat spell is the lowest level and delve, which kinds of sucks hehe
(If Charplan is correct)
Givf upgrade!! 
|
Xenja-
Posts: 23
Registered: 2004-6-20 20:18:27
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
You forgot to mention you are the only one with a baseline stun, in a low rr bg where most ppl passing through won't have an instant purge = free rps unless you suck 
-----signature-----
Xenj*, Xeniia, Xenxiu, Topdolla*, Instalol, Batcountry, Khi, Xwn, Seniormangement, 24duration, Flopdollar, Bibidibabidi
Spread Hard Push Deep
“Nobody expects the Danish Inquisitionâ€
|
wiciri
Posts: 30
Registered: 2004-1-26 22:21:02
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
You could make an argument that a higher baseline dd should be added to both the chanter and runemaster lines, but I doubt bg class balance is a major concern for them at this point.
-----signature-----
Percival - Fate
Liomas - Cleric, Wiciri - Paladin, Wiiciri - sorcerer
Gareth
Liomas - Bard
|
DemonicXH
Title: Camelot Vault Staff
News Editor
Posts: 584
Registered: 2003-12-1 08:14:17
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
|
Respec to 45 light 27 mana if you want to be a ST nuker.
Stun, debuff, nuke , profit.
|
Phlei
Posts: 214
Registered: 2008-12-10 18:38:51
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
you forgot some:
Wizard:
ICE: level 41. 148dd delve
FIRE: level 47. 172dd delve
Theurg:
ICE: level 41. 148dd delve.
Eld:
Void: level 47. 172dd delve.
Ment:
Mentalism: level 45. 161dd delve.
Sooo, luck of the draw. I haven't seen testing #'s, but I'd go light spec in CV due to low level base DD, unless you only run debuff train. And if you don't plan on running train that night, respec light.
-----signature-----
DAoC - inactive.
VN'ing - active.
|
Saxona
Title: Viking of Paragon
Posts: 248
Registered: 2003-11-17 19:40:46
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
There's a lot of weaknesses for various classes in battlegrounds, it's just the unfortunate reality of battlegrounds. Bainshee's PW single target nuke is level 20 in Thidranki, making for a pretty weak delve. The highest level casted nuke for necro's in Molvik in the deathsight spec is only 35. If you're a Mana Eld or Suppression RM, you're highest level spec nuke is only 41.
If you don't like it, play a different class or spec, because that's all you can really do. While Mythic is gearing towards a better battlegrounds experience, it's unlikely they will ever balance around battlegrounds, as it would adversely affect end game RvR.
-----signature-----
- Grace -
People who don't punch their ponies make me sick.
|
Gloriena
Posts: 48
Registered: 2004-2-13 06:26:27
|
Date Posted:
1/1/00 12:00am
Subject:
Do you think you could upgrade enchanters baseline heat-dd to be more "CV Friendly" :)
|
Hehe.. If you noticed I only meant to compare delves to those who are able to debuff their own damage type, like RM/SM/Cabby and Chanter can.. not other random classes baseline nukes.
It's not like the chanter has a lot of utility, single target nuke-wise =D
But thanks for the "great" replies 
|
